SuperbaKnowledge Demonstration release
Platforms
ENIT
Operational guide · SMS process

Emergency Preparedness and Contingency Plan

Emergency preparedness under the ISM Code connects scenarios, procedures, drill programmes and the response capability of the ship and shore organization.

emergency preparednesscontingency planISM §8drill

Operational Explanation

Section 8 of the ISM Code is not limited to requiring a written plan. The Company must identify potential emergency shipboard situations and establish response procedures (§8.1), establish programmes for drills and exercises (§8.2), and ensure through the SMS that the Company's organization can respond at any time to hazards, accidents and emergencies involving its ships (§8.3).

IMO Guidelines A.1072(28) propose an integrated, modular structure to harmonize the different emergency plans, distinguish initial actions from subsequent response, and clarify duties, resources, communications and ship-shore interfaces. Drills provide useful evidence for evaluating procedures and identifying improvements; one drill, however, does not by itself establish the ship's overall readiness.

Section 8 requires a programme but sets no single frequency for every type of drill. Timing, content and method must be checked against the applicable instruments, including SOLAS, flag requirements, approved plans and the SMS. Equipment availability, maintenance and checks also fall under ISM section 10 and the relevant statutory regime: they should be coordinated with emergency preparedness without confusing an exercise with a technical test.

Regulatory Reference

ISM Code, section 8 — Emergency preparedness. Its three paragraphs cover identification and procedures (§8.1), programmes for drills and exercises (§8.2), and the ability of the Company's organization to respond at any time (§8.3). Resolution A.741(18) is the original adoption text and should be read with the later amendments listed by IMO.

Guidance and control. A.1072(28) provides a recommended structure for integrated emergency plans. For port State control, the current reference is A.1206(34), Procedures for Port State Control, 2025, which revoked A.1185(33).

Official sources: IMO: ISM Code and amendments · A.741(18), original text · A.1072(28), integrated plans · A.1206(34), PSC 2025 · IMO: lifeboat drill safety.

Scope of Application

Section 8 applies to ships subject to the ISM Code. Scenarios, specific plans, drills and their frequencies depend on ship type, operations, persons on board, cargoes, area of operation and applicable statutory instruments. The scenario set should therefore be based on the ship's actual profile and kept consistent with the relevant mandatory plans.

From Plan to Evidence

  1. Identify and prioritize scenarios. Assess hazards, likelihood and consequences in the ship's context.
  2. Define response tasks. Separate initial actions from subsequent response and state escalation criteria.
  3. Assign roles, resources and communications. Connect shipboard personnel, the shore organization and relevant external authorities or services.
  4. Integrate the plans. Remove overlaps and conflicts while keeping clear which controlled document governs each action.
  5. Align ship and shore. Keep versions, contacts, responsibilities and communication lines consistent.
  6. Train and exercise. Schedule drills and exercises at the frequencies and by the methods required by the applicable instruments, with prior safety assessment.
  7. Review and improve. Record observations, assign actions with owners and due dates, verify effectiveness and update plans and training where necessary.

Connected route. In ISM Easy Maps, the guided Drills and exercises route follows preparation, conduct and review.

Open the route in ISM Easy Maps ↗

Practical Example

During a fire drill, the report from the simulated fire area reaches the bridge late and lacks some of the required information. The debrief separates the cause: procedure wording, familiarization or communication equipment. The corrective action is assigned to an owner, the controlled procedure is revised only if needed, affected personnel are briefed and a later exercise verifies effectiveness. The record retains the scenario, participants, observations, decisions, due dates and final verification.

What Typically Goes Wrong

Meeting the calendar and completing the record are not enough. Preparedness is weakened when the plan is generic, ship and shore use different information, the drill has no observable objectives, or findings do not lead to verified actions. Realism does not justify tests or manoeuvres that put people, the ship, passengers or cargo at risk.

Common Mistakes Mistake Library

MistakeConsequenceHow to Avoid It
Generic plan not aligned with the ship's profileRoles, resources and actions do not match the actual scenarioConnect scenarios, operations, statutory plans and ship-shore interfaces
Drill treated as a calendar exercise onlyWeaknesses remain unseen or are not closedSet observable objectives, debrief, actions and effectiveness verification
Exercise confused with indiscriminate equipment testingUnnecessary risk to people or the shipFollow requirements, instructions, operating limits and risk assessment
Shore organization response not exercisedCommunications and support may fail during an emergencyPeriodically include ship-shore interfaces and relevant external parties
Versions or contacts differ between ship and shoreDelay, conflicting instructions and loss of controlUse document control and periodic checks of contact details and responsibilities

What the PSCO Checks

The 2025 Procedures for Port State Control distinguish document review from operational control. Where the conditions for operational control exist, the PSCO first reviews training and drill records and, as appropriate, associated equipment and maintenance records. The PSCO should consider requesting a drill where records indicate that the specified drill has not been conducted in accordance with Convention requirements. When witnessing a drill, the PSCO considers matters including muster-list duties, sufficient personnel, communications, teamwork and mutual understanding. Control must not impose tests that, in the master's judgement, could jeopardize safety. A demonstration drill is therefore not an automatic part of every inspection.

Operational Tips

Preparation Checklist

Educational checklist. This summary supports learning and preparation only. It does not replace the vessel's approved procedures, manuals, statutory documents, Company SMS, or applicable official requirements. Completing it demonstrates neither compliance nor readiness for an inspection: it shows that a list has been read, not that the ship is in order. Always verify the current documents carried on board.

FAQ

What is the difference between a contingency plan and a drill?
The plan organizes procedures, roles, resources, communications and references for responding to a scenario. A drill exercises defined elements of that response and produces observations for learning and improvement; by itself it does not certify overall readiness.
Does ISM section 8 set the frequency of every drill?
No. Section 8.2 requires programmes for drills and exercises. Frequencies and content for specific drills must be checked against applicable instruments, flag requirements, approved plans and the SMS.
Does every drill require actual equipment operation?
No. Follow the applicable requirement and method, equipment instructions and risk assessment. Simulation, demonstration and actual operation have different purposes and limits.
Does the PSCO always require a demonstration drill?
No. IMO procedures require professional judgement and specific conditions. Records are reviewed before practical control, and the PSCO should consider a drill where the specified drill was not conducted in accordance with Convention requirements; safety remains an explicit limit.

Related Topics

Certified substantive revision: 29 August 2026 · page fingerprint 380c8ff65090