SuperbaKnowledge Demonstration release
Platforms
ENIT
Operational guide · Operational procedure

MARPOL Annex III: Harmful Substances Carried in Packaged Form

Package and CTU marking follows specific IMDG provisions, including the 5 L/5 kg package exception; spill reporting follows MARPOL Article 8/Protocol I and is coordinated with SMS and safety reporting.

MARPOL Annex IIImarine pollutantIMDG

Operational Explanation

Determine from the Dangerous Goods List and special provisions whether a substance is a marine pollutant. Package marking and CTU placarding/marking have distinct rules. An IMDG exception may apply to packages of liquids ≤5 L or solids ≤5 kg net mass where general packaging provisions are met; do not automatically extend it to the CTU.

Regulatory Reference

MARPOL Annex III and IMDG Code for harmful substances in packaged form. Incident reporting: MARPOL Article 8 and Protocol I, A.851(20) guidelines as amended, and current national operational contact points.

Scope of Application

Packages, CTUs and bulk containers with marine pollutants under DGL and applicable provisions. The 5 L/5 kg exception is limited to packages within its conditions; CTU marking is checked separately.

Procedure / How to Complete It

  1. Determine marine-pollutant status from DGL and special provisions.
  2. Apply package mark and CTU placarding/marking under their respective rules.
  3. Assess the ≤5 L liquid or ≤5 kg net solid package exception only where general packaging provisions are met.
  4. On spill activate emergency response/SMS and protect people and ship.
  5. Assess reportability under MARPOL Article 8/Protocol I and coastal/port duties; report without delay to applicable recipients/contact points.
  6. Coordinate safety, dangerous-goods and pollution reporting without duplication or omitted recipients.

Practical Example

Small inner packages may meet the 5 L/5 kg exception if all conditions are satisfied; that does not automatically decide CTU marking. On release, the ship uses a coordinated SMS flow and national contact points, not a presumed separate Annex III notice in every case.

What Typically Goes Wrong

Always marking every package without checking the exception, extending a package exception to the CTU or creating two separate reports solely because material is Annex III.

Common Mistakes Mistake Library

MistakeConsequenceHow to avoid it
'MARINE POLLUTANT' marking not applied because it is considered redundant relative to the primary IMDG class labellingNon-compliance with MARPOL Annex III even when the IMDG safety classification is correctAlways apply the specific marine pollutant marking when required, in addition to, not instead of, the primary class labelling
Transport documentation showing only the primary IMDG hazard classification, omitting marine pollutant statusDocumentation incomplete for the purposes of MARPOL Annex IIICheck and explicitly include marine pollutant status in the documentation, when applicable
Notification procedures in the event of a spillage at sea limited to safety emergency management alone, without the specific notifications required by MARPOL Annex IIIFailure to comply with specific environmental notification obligations in the event of a spillageIntegrate the specific notification procedures for the spillage of substances classified as marine pollutants into the contingency plan

What the PSCO Checks

Port State Control Officers (PSCOs) check that substances classified as marine pollutants under the IMDG Code carry the specific marking required and that the transport documentation gives explicit evidence of this, in addition to checking the primary safety classification.

Operational Tips

Preparation checklist

FAQ

Must every marine-pollutant package always bear the mark?
No. The ≤5 L liquid or ≤5 kg net solid exception may apply if IMDG conditions are met.
Does the package exception automatically remove CTU marking?
No. Check CTU provisions and contents separately.
Does Annex III always require a report separate from safety reporting?
No. Reporting derives from MARPOL Article 8/Protocol I and applicable duties; flows may be coordinated without omitting recipients.

Related Topics

Last substantive revision of this page: 31 August 2026 · page fingerprint ad52565f6f09