SuperbaKnowledge Demonstration release
Platforms
ENIT
Operational guide · Operational procedure

Discharges in Polar Waters: MARPOL Requirements and Polar Code Part II-A

In the Arctic, discharging oil is prohibited — but not «without exceptions»: the resolution that introduced the ban amended Regulation 4 of Annex I precisely in order to preserve them. And the Polar Code is not only about oil: for sewage and garbage it sets precise distances and sizes.

Polar Codepolar watersArcticAntarcticdischarges

Operational Explanation

The Polar Code (International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters) has made mandatory, through its Part II-A, a set of discharge restrictions in polar waters stricter than those under MARPOL alone, incorporated as additional requirements into Annexes I, II, IV and V. Paragraph 1.1.1 is a single line: “In Arctic waters any discharge into the sea of oil or oily mixtures from any ship shall be prohibited”. No tonnage threshold, no concentration limit, no en-route condition: where elsewhere you discharge at 15 ppm, in the Arctic you do not discharge.

But not “without exceptions”

Resolution MEPC.265(68), which inserted the Polar Code into the MARPOL Annexes, contains this instruction: the chapeau of Regulation 4 of Annex I “is replaced with the following: ‘Regulations 15 and 34 of this Annex and paragraph 1.1.1 of part II-A of the Polar Code shall not apply to:’”. The remainder of Regulation 4 was left untouched, and continues to exempt discharge necessary for the purpose of securing the safety of a ship or saving life at sea, discharge resulting from damage to a ship or its equipment (provided all reasonable precautions were taken and there was no intent or recklessness) and the use of approved anti-pollution substances to combat a specific pollution incident.

This is not an isolated choice: the same pattern was repeated across every other Annex. MEPC.265(68) inserted chapter 2 of the Polar Code into the chapeau of Regulation 3 of Annex II, section 4.2 into that of Regulation 3 of Annex IV and section 5.2 into that of Regulation 7 of Annex V. The choice is systematic, and it says what the polar ban actually means: absolute as to operational discharges, not as to emergencies. Writing “without exceptions” is not a harmless overstatement: it tells the Master that in a casualty he has no lawful route, and that is the opposite of what the Convention tells him.

Two points on scope. Paragraph 1.1.1 does not apply to clean or segregated ballast (paragraph 1.1.2). And chapters 1 and 2 speak of Arctic waters, not of polar waters generally: in Antarctica the ban already comes from Annex I, which treats the Antarctic area as a Special Area with an absolute prohibition (Regulation 15.4). Chapters 4 and 5 are built differently, and must be read region by region.

Annex II — noxious liquid substances

Chapter 2 is equally brief: “In Arctic waters any discharge into the sea of noxious liquid substances (NLS), or mixtures containing such substances, shall be prohibited”. The Arctic scope applies. For category A and B ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017, the carriage of NLS identified as ship type 3 in chapter 17 (column e) of the IBC Code, or identified as NLS in chapter 18, in cargo tanks of type 3 ships is subject to the approval of the Administration, with the outcome reflected on the certificate.

Annex IV — sewage: the distances from ice

Here the Polar Code gives numbers, and chapter 4 applies to all polar waters, Arctic and Antarctic alike. Discharge is prohibited unless it complies with Annex IV and with one of these three conditions:

Category A and B ships and all passenger ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017 may discharge only through an approved treatment plant: for them the first two routes are closed. Paragraph 4.2.3 closes those same two routes to a second group of ships, and with no condition as to date of construction: “Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph 4.2.1, category A and B ships that operate in areas of ice concentrations exceeding 1/10 for extended periods of time, may only discharge sewage using an approved sewage treatment plant certified by the Administration to meet the operational requirements in either regulation 9.1.1 or 9.2.1 of MARPOL Annex IV”. A category A or B ship operating for extended periods in areas of ice concentration exceeding 1/10 therefore has the approved plant as its only route, whether it was constructed before or after 1 January 2017. Ice-shelf and fast ice are not synonyms for pack ice: the first is a floating sheet of considerable thickness attached to the coast, the second is sea ice frozen fast along the shore. The distance is measured from those, not from ice in general.

Annex V — garbage: 12 miles, 25 millimetres, and the ban on discharging onto ice

In Arctic waters, discharge permitted under Regulation 4 of Annex V must additionally meet four conditions the page had never named:

Cargo residues that cannot be recovered using commonly available unloading methods may be discharged only while the ship is en route and on three cumulative conditions: that the hold washing water contain no substances classified as harmful to the marine environment, that the port of departure and the next port of destination be both within Arctic waters with no transit outside them in between, and that no adequate reception facilities be available at those ports. Once all three are met, paragraph 5.2.1.5.4 prescribes where: the discharge of hold washing water containing residues must be made as far as practicable from areas of ice concentration exceeding 1/10 and in any case not less than 12 nautical miles from the nearest land, the nearest ice-shelf or the nearest fast ice.

In the Antarctic area, chapter 5 asks two things: discharge permitted under Regulation 6 of Annex V must be as far as practicable from concentrations exceeding 1/10 and in any case not less than 12 nautical miles from the nearest fast ice — here the text names only fast ice, not the ice-shelf — and the ban on discharging food waste onto ice applies here too.

Regulatory Reference

Polar Code Part II-A (mandatory since 2017, incorporated into MARPOL Annexes I, II, IV and V): discharge of oil and oily mixtures prohibited in Arctic waters (para. 1.1.1, save clean or segregated ballast under para. 1.1.2); discharge of NLS prohibited in Arctic waters (para. 2.1.1); sewage permitted in all polar waters at 3 miles from ice-shelf or fast ice if comminuted and disinfected, 12 miles if not, with no fixed distance where an approved treatment plant is fitted (sect. 4.2); for category A and B ships operating for extended periods in areas of ice concentration exceeding 1/10 an approved plant meeting Regulation 9.1.1 or 9.2.1 is the only route allowed, whatever the date of construction (para. 4.2.3); food wastes in the Arctic not less than 12 miles, comminuted to 25 mm, never onto ice, carcasses prohibited (sect. 5.2); hold washing water containing cargo residues, only where the three conditions of para. 5.2.1.5 are met, as far as practicable from ice concentrations exceeding 1/10 and in any case not less than 12 miles from the nearest land, ice-shelf or fast ice (para. 5.2.1.5.4). The exceptions in Regulations 4 (Annex I), 3 (Annexes II and IV) and 7 (Annex V) remain available: their chapeaux were amended by resolution MEPC.265(68) precisely in order to extend them to the polar prohibitions. The text of the Code is in resolution MEPC.264(68). Since 1 July 2024, the ban on using and carrying Heavy Fuel Oil (HFO) as fuel in Arctic waters has also been in force (MARPOL Annex I, Regulation 43A, introduced by resolution MEPC.329(76), in force since 1 November 2022). Regulation 43A has, however, two dates: para. 2 sets the ban running from 1 July 2029 for ships to which Regulation 12A of Annex I or para. 1.2.1 of chapter 1 of part II-A of the Polar Code applies, and para. 4 provides that temporary waivers do not apply on or after 1 July 2029. 2023 amendments to the Polar Code, in force since 1 January 2026, extend further navigation safety requirements to fishing vessels, pleasure yachts and cargo ships of 300-500 GT.

Scope of Application

Every ship operating in Arctic or Antarctic waters as defined by the Polar Code, with the Master responsible for applying the stricter discharge restrictions of Part II-A, in addition to — not instead of — standard MARPOL requirements.

Procedure / How to Complete It

  1. Check whether the planned route crosses Arctic or Antarctic waters as defined by the Polar Code, before departure.
  2. Discharge no oil and no oily mixtures for the whole transit through Arctic waters: the paragraph 1.1.1 prohibition has no thresholds and no operational conditions. The exceptions in Regulation 4 of Annex I — safety of the ship, saving life at sea, damage, approved anti-pollution substances — remain available, resolution MEPC.265(68) having expressly extended them to the polar prohibition. If one of them arises, the Oil Record Book entry must be written as such, with the circumstances.
  3. Verify compliance with the ban on using and carrying HFO as fuel in Arctic waters, in force since 1 July 2024 (Annex I, Regulation 43A, para. 1), including any applicable exemptions. For ships to which Regulation 12A of Annex I or para. 1.2.1 of chapter 1 of part II-A of the Polar Code applies, the ban instead runs from 1 July 2029 (para. 2); from that same date temporary waivers cease to apply (para. 4).
  4. For sewage, measure the distance from ice-shelf and fast ice, not from the coast: 3 miles if comminuted and disinfected, 12 if not, no fixed distance with an approved plant. On category A and B ships and on all passenger ships constructed on or after 1 January 2017, the approved plant is the only route. The same applies, whatever the date of construction, to category A and B ships operating for extended periods in areas of ice concentration exceeding 1/10 (para. 4.2.3).
  5. For food wastes in the Arctic: not less than 12 miles from land, ice-shelf or fast ice, comminuted to 25 mm, not contaminated by other garbage, never onto the ice. Animal carcasses are not discharged. For NLS in the Arctic there is no permitted discharge.
  6. Document, in the Oil Record Book and other relevant logs, the application of Polar Code restrictions during the polar transit.

Practical Example

Example: a ship transiting the Canadian Arctic plans the voyage by verifying in advance that no discharges of any kind of oil will occur during the entire polar leg, and confirms compliance with the HFO ban in force since 2024, coordinated with the Fuel Oil Changeover already planned for the region's new ECAs, designated from 1 March 2026 with the SOx/PM limits applicable from 1 March 2027.

What Typically Goes Wrong

The Polar Code's approach replicates in the Arctic the restrictions already well established in Antarctica, where the oil discharge ban has been in force for decades as a MARPOL Special Area: extending these protections to the Arctic — an area with growing shipping traffic as new commercial routes open — reflects growing international attention to the fragility of polar ecosystems against oil pollution.

Common Mistakes Mistake Library

MistakeConsequenceHow to avoid it
Applying only the standard MARPOL rules during a transit through polar waters, without considering the additional restrictions of Polar Code Part II-ADischarge non-compliant with the stricter restrictions specifically applicable in polar watersAlways verify the applicability of Polar Code Part II-A, which overrides — not merely coincides with — standard MARPOL
Voyage planning for the Arctic that does not check the HFO ban in force since 2024Non-compliant carriage or use of HFO fuel in a banned areaVerify compliance with the HFO ban and any applicable exemptions before planning an Arctic transit
Food wastes discharged per the standard Annex V limits (3 miles if comminuted, 12 otherwise) even in Arctic watersNon-compliant discharge: in the Arctic the minimum distance is 12 miles in every case, comminution must be to 25 mm, and nothing may end up on the iceIn the Arctic apply the figures in section 5.2: 12 miles from land, ice-shelf or fast ice, a 25 mm screen, the ban on discharging onto ice and the ban on discharging carcasses

What the PSCO Checks

For ships operating in polar waters, Port State Control Officers (PSCOs) check compliance with Polar Code Part II-A in addition to standard MARPOL requirements, including voyage documentation demonstrating specific planning for the polar transit.

Operational Tips

Preparation checklist

Educational checklist. This summary supports learning and preparation only. It does not replace the vessel’s approved procedures, manuals, statutory documents, company SMS, or applicable official requirements. Completing it demonstrates neither compliance nor readiness for an inspection: it shows that a list has been read, not that the ship is in order. Always verify the current documents carried on board.

FAQ

Does the Polar Code replace MARPOL in polar waters?
No: it applies in addition to MARPOL, introducing stricter restrictions (Part II-A) incorporated into Annexes I, II, IV and V, not in place of the standard requirements.
Is it banned to discharge oil in the Arctic in all circumstances?
No, and the distinction matters. Paragraph 1.1.1 of Part II-A prohibits every operational discharge of oil or oily mixtures in Arctic waters, from any ship and with no thresholds. But the exceptions in Regulation 4 of Annex I remain available: safety of the ship, saving life at sea, damage to the ship or its equipment with all reasonable precautions taken, use of approved anti-pollution substances. Resolution MEPC.265(68) rewrote the chapeau of Regulation 4 expressly adding paragraph 1.1.1 to it: extending the exemptions to the polar prohibition is deliberate, not a leftover. Clean or segregated ballast falls outside the ban altogether under paragraph 1.1.2.
How far from ice may sewage and food wastes be discharged?
Sewage (chapter 4, all polar waters): more than 3 nautical miles from ice-shelf or fast ice if comminuted and disinfected, more than 12 if not, no fixed distance where the ship has an approved treatment plant — in every case as far as practicable from ice concentrations exceeding 1/10. For category A and B ships operating for extended periods in areas of ice concentration exceeding 1/10, paragraph 4.2.3 allows the approved plant alone, with no condition as to date of construction. Food wastes (chapter 5, Arctic waters): not less than 12 nautical miles from the nearest land, ice-shelf or fast ice, comminuted so as to pass a 25 mm screen, never discharged onto ice. In the Antarctic area: not less than 12 miles from the nearest fast ice, and nothing onto ice.
Since when has using HFO as fuel been banned in the Arctic?
Since 1 July 2024, under Regulation 43A of MARPOL Annex I (resolution MEPC.329(76), in force since 1 November 2022), subject to any applicable national exemptions. Regulation 43A does, however, carry a second date: for ships to which Regulation 12A of Annex I or para. 1.2.1 of chapter 1 of part II-A of the Polar Code applies, the ban runs from 1 July 2029 (para. 2), and on or after 1 July 2029 temporary waivers no longer apply (para. 4).

Related Topics

Last substantive revision of this page: 19 August 2026 · page fingerprint ff9436f95915