SuperbaKnowledge Demonstration release
Platforms
ENIT
Operational guide · Operational procedure

SOPEP — Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan

The emergency plan for oil spills: it must be ready to use, not merely present on board.

SOPEPemergencyspillMARPOL Annex I

Operational Explanation

The SOPEP is the approved plan describing the immediate actions to be taken in the event of an oil spill: notification to the authorities, containment, use of onboard anti-pollution materials, and up-to-date emergency contacts.

Regulatory Reference

MARPOL Annex I, Regulation 37. Ships of 150 gross tonnage and above carrying noxious liquid substances in bulk keep the SMPEP required by Annex II Regulation 17. The two plans may be combined into a single document, as IMO itself suggests: most of their contents coincide, and in an emergency one plan is more practical than two.

The plan is one thing; the duty to report is another, and it is not in the Annex. It is in Article 8 of the Convention — “A report of an incident shall be made without delay to the fullest extent possible in accordance with the provisions of Protocol I to the present Convention” — and in Protocol I, which sets out the regime in five articles: Duty to report (I), When to make reports (II), Contents of report (III), Supplementary report (IV), Reporting procedures (V). The SOPEP tells the ship how to respond; Protocol I establishes when and to whom she must speak, and that is the part most often missing when an incident ends up in an investigation.

Who reports. Article I places the duty on the “master or other person having charge of any ship”. And it provides for the worst case: if the ship is abandoned, or if a report from her is incomplete or unobtainable, the duty passes “to the owner, charterer, manager or operator of the ship, or their agent”. There is no scenario in which nobody has to report.

When. Article II lists four triggers, and the third is the one underestimated on board because it has nothing to do with pollution. A report is due on: a discharge above the permitted level or probable discharge of oil or noxious liquid substances, “for whatever reason including those for the purpose of securing the safety of the ship or for saving life at sea” (a); a discharge or probable discharge of harmful substances in packaged form, freight containers, portable tanks, road and rail vehicles and shipborne barges (b); damage, failure or breakdown of a ship of 15 metres in length or above which “affects the safety of the ship; including but not limited to collision, grounding, fire, explosion, structural failure, flooding, and cargo shifting”, or which “results to impairment of the safety of navigation; including but not limited to, failure or breakdown of steering gear, propulsion plant, electrical generating system, and essential shipborne navigational aids” (c); and an operational discharge in excess of the quantity or instantaneous rate permitted (d). Sub-paragraph (c) therefore requires a report of a steering gear failure or a blackout with not one drop in the water: the trigger is the risk, not the event.

What, how, and then again. The minimum content (Article III) is the identity of the ships involved, the time, type and location of the incident, the quantity and type of harmful substance, and assistance and salvage measures. The procedure (Article V): “by the fastest telecommunications channels available with the highest possible priority to the nearest coastal State” — to the nearest coastal State, not to the flag, and not to the owner first. And Article IV requires the initial report to be supplemented with further developments and requests from affected States to be answered as fully as possible: reporting is a flow, not a duty discharged by pressing send. Formats and operational procedures are in resolution A.851(20), whose §3.2 expressly invokes Article V(1) of Protocol I.

Scope of Application

Every oil tanker of 150 GT and above and every other ship of 400 GT and above must carry a SOPEP approved by the Administration (Regulation 37.1). The 150 GT figure is not an additional requirement for tankers: it is their applicability threshold, lower than that for other ships.

Procedure / How to Complete It

  1. Verify that the plan on board is the latest approved version, with the correct ship particulars.
  2. Check that the list of emergency contacts (Flag, P&I Club, local agencies, coastal authorities) is up to date.
  3. Verify the availability, expiry and location of the response equipment and materials specified for this ship by the approved SOPEP/SMPEP, the company SMS and flag, coastal or port State requirements: the outfit is not the same on every ship. Do not deploy dispersants unless permitted by the competent authority and provided for by the approved response arrangements.
  4. Conduct the SOPEP drill at the frequency set by the Safety Management System.
  5. Document the drill: scenario, participants, response times, issues identified, corrective actions.

Practical Example

Example drill scenario: simulated spill during bunkering, with activation of the emergency team, deployment of absorbent booms, simulated notification to the port authority, debrief and recording of issues found (e.g. equipment retrieval time longer than expected).

What Typically Goes Wrong

Vetting and PSC inspections have repeatedly found SOPEPs with outdated emergency contacts (invalid phone numbers, changed agencies) never updated after a change of management company — a simple non-conformity to avoid, yet a frequent one.

Common Mistakes Mistake Library

MistakeConsequenceHow to avoid it
Emergency contacts not updatedDelayed notification in a real spillReview contacts at every change of management or agency
Drill not documented or too genericNon-conformity at an ISM audit, observation at a SIRE/CDI inspectionRecord scenario, timings and lessons learned for every drill
Containment materials expired or insufficientInability to respond effectively in realityPeriodic check of stock and expiry dates

What the PSCO Checks

SIRE and CDI vetting inspectors and PSCOs check the date of the last SOPEP drill and the consistency of emergency contacts with the ship's current management situation. Note the different outcomes: a Port State Control Officer (PSCO) raises a deficiency with an action code, a vetting inspector records an observation in the Ship Inspection Report, an ISM auditor raises a non-conformity. TMSA produces none of these: it is the Company's own self-assessment, not an inspection carried out on board.

Operational Tips

Preparation checklist

Educational checklist. This summary supports learning and preparation only. It does not replace the vessel’s approved procedures, manuals, statutory documents, company SMS, or applicable official requirements. Completing it demonstrates neither compliance nor readiness for an inspection: it shows that a list has been read, not that the ship is in order. Always verify the current documents carried on board.

FAQ

How often must the SOPEP drill be carried out?
At the frequency set by the company's Safety Management System, typically at least annually, integrated with general emergency drills.
Does the SOPEP replace the SMPEP?
No: ships carrying NLS (Noxious Liquid Substances) in bulk must also have an SMPEP under MARPOL Annex II.

Related Topics

Last substantive revision of this page: 28 August 2026 · page fingerprint 57a1dac48937